Arjun's admissions report
Executive summary
Arjun presents a first-generation STEM profile that hits every technical mark for top CS programs: 4.0 unweighted GPA from Lexington High, seven AP exams with five 5s in STEM, SAT 1540, USACO Platinum winter 2024, and 18 months of Harvard-mentored deep-learning research ending in co-authorship on a submitted paper. The nonprofit Code-for-Lexington adds documented community impact with 12 contributors and 80 enrolled students across four elementary schools.
The challenge is architectural. Every school on the current list admits CS applicants at rates between 3 and 18 percent, and half are outright lotteries under 10 percent. The profile is competitive everywhere but guaranteed nowhere. The list needs two changes: add true safeties above 75 percent admit and consider two reach liberal-arts colleges that value first-gen STEM depth and offer smaller applicant pools.
First-generation status is a meaningful lift at every private on the list and worth highlighting in optional essays. The research mentorship with Harvard and the nonprofit leadership are both externally validated accomplishments that will differentiate in holistic review. Senior-year strategy should focus on maintaining rigor, polishing the Common App narrative around the protein-folding click moment, and applying early action to MIT and one or two other non-binding reaches.
Full analysis
Acceptance probabilities
Each probability uses the school's catalog major-pool rate for CS when available — Stanford CS, MIT CS, CMU SCS, and Berkeley EECS all sit at 3 to 5 percent base. First-generation status adds 5 to 8 points at most privates. USACO Platinum and the Harvard research co-authorship each earn the named-accomplishment bonus. The SAT 1540 sits at or above the 75th percentile at 18 of 22 schools.
Confidence intervals are ±12 percentage points uniformly. We do not have residency-stratified outcomes or multi-year calibration data for OOS public CS pools, so treat the point estimates as central tendencies with real variance. Reach tier (sub-35 percent) is where strong applicants regularly come up short; Target (35–69) is competitive but realistic; Likely (70+) is the confident floor.
Transcript read
Lexington High School (Lexington, MA), Class of 2026 — a focused CS applicant with USACO Platinum + Harvard-mentored research as the load-bearing signals.
Strengths
Three strengths the file projects clearly to admissions readers.
Risk register
Five concerns, ranked by probability impact. Every flag below is addressable on the timeline that’s left.
Test-score deep dive
Current SAT: 1540 (M780 / EBRW760), single sitting November 2025. Position vs target schools’ middle-50%, with retake value per school.
Senior coursework
The current draft of the personal narrative reads as a “USACO-and-research” story. Both arcs are strong individually. Together, they put two thirds of the essay on top of the same technical signal — exactly the breadth concern flagged in §5.
The most under-used arc in the file is Code-for-Lexington. The narrative could open with the founding moment (your motivation, what you saw missing in town), thread the USACO + research arcs as the technical voice that grew out of it, and close with what you’ve seen change.
Three school-specific framings
Extracurricular assessment
Spring ’26 baseline (currently planned): AP Stat, AP Lit, AP Spanish, CS independent study, music theory. Three complete plans, scored on probability lift AND narrative coherence.
Narrative read
Tier reads at admissions readers — three layers of legibility.
Recommendations
- ·Promote Code-for-Lexington to slot 3 with an outcome-anchored description.
- ·Demote piano to slot 5 with hours that reflect the actual long commitment, not the perceived prestige.
- ·Re-write the cross-country bullet to lead with captaincy + team-building if no state-level placement is forthcoming.
- ·The bottom seven activities don't need to disappear, but should be condensed; they currently dilute the signal of the top four.
ED/EA strategy
Binding commitment is the single largest lever. The conventional wisdom — “apply ED to your top choice” — ignores that schools vary wildly in how much ED actually moves the needle.
For this profile, ED to CMU SCS is the dominant move. EA to Caltech, Georgia Tech, and UMich CoE stack on top — all non-restrictive. Avoid REA at MIT because the lift is smaller than the cost of forfeiting Caltech EA + UMich EA.
Added school recommendations
Five suggestions the family list is missing — each with the read for THIS specific student.
Action plan
A complete plan from now through every deadline. Every item is tied to a section in this report.
Any upload — new transcript, test score, activity, or target — rebuilds all twelve sections against your updated record. $49, about four minutes.
Refresh reportYour student's report — generated in minutes from one upload pass.
$249 one-time. Refresh for $49 whenever a new score, activity, or course lands. Money-back if the report doesn't generate.